|
Thursday, October 02, 2003
Headline from the Guardian:Karl Rove: Boy Genius or Turd Blossom?
Ya gotta love those Brits.
Thanks, Lee.
posted by jeev |
3:33 PM |

Which lies do reporters like best?To the axiom that journalists love lies, however, there's one important corollary � and it helps explain Bush's Teflon coating. Reporters like only certain lies. Perversely, those tend to be the relatively trivial ones, involving personal matters, such as Clinton's deceptions about his sex life. Similarly, Al Gore's talk of having inspired Love Story was seized on by reporters as a "lie," even though it was true. Here, the press can strut its skepticism without positioning itself ideologically.
The lies reporters dislike, in contrast, center on what are usually more important matters: claims about public policy � taxes, abortion, the environment � where raising questions of truthfulness can seem awfully close to taking sides in a partisan debate. Most of Bush's lies have fallen in this demilitarized zone, where journalists fear to tread.
posted by jeev |
3:21 PM |

The best and the brightest:LAST FEBRUARY, retired Lt. Gen. Jay Garner was trying to put together a team of experts to rebuild Iraq after the war was over, and his list included 20 State Department officials. The day before he was supposed to leave for the region, Garner got a call from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who ordered him to cut 16 of the 20 State officials from his roster. It seems that the State Department people were deemed to be Arabist apologists, or squishy about the United Nations, or in some way politically incorrect to the right-wing ideologues at the White House or the neocons in the office of the Secretary of Defense. The vetting process �got so bad that even doctors sent to restore medical services had to be anti-abortion,� recalled one of Garner�s team. Finally, Secretary of State Colin Powell tried to stand up for his troops and stop Rumsfeld�s meddling. �I can take hostages, too,� Powell warned the secretary of Defense. �How hard do you want to play this thing?� Unsurprisingly, Powell lost.
Thanks, Melinda.
posted by jeev |
3:07 PM |

Wednesday, October 01, 2003
I feel your pain. From Electrolite:From Teresa Nielsen Hayden,
posted on January 29, 2003 05:04 PM:
I deeply resent the way this administration makes me feel like a nutbar conspiracy theorist.
posted by jeev |
11:30 PM |

Oh, my, Saddam Hussein lied? How astonishing: With no chemical or biological weapons yet found in Iraq, the U.S. official in charge of the search for Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction is pursuing the possibility that the Iraqi leader was bluffing, pretending he had distributed them to his most loyal commanders to deter the United States from invading. Need to know more?
posted by jeev |
11:13 PM |

Today's Valeriegate update: Nearly seven in 10 Americans believe a special prosecutor should be named to investigate allegations that Bush administration officials illegally leaked the name of an undercover CIA agent, according to a Washington Post/ABC News poll released yesterday.
The poll, taken after the Justice Department announced that it had opened a criminal probe into the matter, pointed to several troubling signs for the White House as Bush aides decide how to contain the damage. The survey found that 81 percent of Americans considered the matter serious, while 72 percent thought it likely that someone in the White House leaked the agent's name.
posted by jeev |
11:07 PM |

Normally I wouldn't post a link to the Washington Times. It's just too scary a paper. But this is a doozy, found by means of Good Morning Silicon Valley:The CIA is set to spend several million dollars to develop a video game aimed at helping its analysts think like terrorists, The Washington Times has learned.
The agency's Counter Terrorist Center, or CTC, is working with the Los Angeles-based Institute for Creative Technologies on a project designed to help its analysts, "think outside the box," a CIA spokesman said. The project is close to approval, but officials wouldn't comment on the exact cost of the program.
The institute, part of the University of Southern California, works with Hollywood movie and video game specialists. So that's where the $87 billion is going.
posted by jeev |
4:29 PM |

Tuesday, September 30, 2003
For a taste of how this story is playing abroad, here is a Real stream of the Guardian's Julian Borger.
From The Poor Man, via Marnie at Crankreport.
posted by jeev |
3:28 PM |

More on the Valerie Plame story:Another journalist yesterday confirmed receiving a call from an administration official providing the same information about Wilson's wife before the Novak column appeared on July 14 in The Post and other newspapers.
The journalist, who asked not to be identified because of possible legal ramifications, said that the information was provided as part of an effort to discredit Wilson, but that the CIA information was not treated as especially sensitive. "The official I spoke with thought this was a part of Wilson's story that wasn't known and cast doubt on his whole mission," the person said, declining to identify the official he spoke with. "They thought Wilson was having a good ride and this was part of Wilson's story."
In addition to Novak's column, an administration official told The Washington Post on Saturday that two White House officials leaked the information to several journalists in an effort to discredit Wilson. Bad White House officials. Very bad.
posted by jeev |
3:08 PM |

From Good Morning Silicon Valley - David Bradley:Every time a software program locks up and you want to start over, every time you need to change your password or log on or off your computer, you can thank David J. Bradley.
That's the same David Bradley who was the "answer" to Final Jeopardy on an episode of that show's special college edition last fall.
It's the same David Bradley who saved Bill Gates' derriere before the Windows operating system became the monster it is today.
Bradley is the man who gave the world "control-alt-delete."
posted by jeev |
2:15 PM |

Something else from Salon you might want to check out: an analysis of the Bush administration's propoganda efforts in Iraq and the Middle East. It starts with the story of Charlotte Beers, former chairwoman and CEO of two of the world's top ad agencies, J. Walter Thompson and Ogilvy & Mather. She was hired after 9/11, as Colin Powell explained, "to change from just selling the U.S. ... to really branding foreign policy."
Efforts like these eventually cost $1 billion a year. Where did the money go?
A $5 million failed "Shared Values" advertising campaign was a typical Beers project. The TV commercial showed average Muslim Americans going about their daily lives, enjoying the lack of religious and racial discrimination in the U.S. Meant to be broadcast in Islamic countries, the "Shared Values" ad prominently featured a woman running in shorts. Deemed offensive to Muslims, the ad was not permitted to be broadcast on many important television stations in Egypt and other largely Islamic countries.
posted by jeev |
1:05 PM |

From Crankreport, as we prepare for the October 7 election:Harris has discovered that Diebold's voting software is so flawed that anyone with access to the system's computer can change the votes without leaving any record. On top of that, she's uncovered internal Diebold memos in which employees seem to suggest that the vulnerabilities are no big deal. The memos appear to be authentic -- Diebold even sent Harris a notice warning her that by posting the documents on the Web, she was infringing upon the company's intellectual property. Diebold did not return several calls for comment. The article is on Salon, and is worth sitting through the ads if you don't have a subscription.
posted by jeev |
1:00 PM |


For those of you who happened to read the NYTimes obituary for Edward Said, and were confused by the paragraph:Because of Dr. Said's prominence, an Israeli scholar, Justus Reid Weiner, spent several years researching his early life to show that Dr. Said had falsified his biography. In an article in Commentary magazine in 1999 Mr. Weiner argued that Dr. Said had cultivated a moving personal story of a Palestinian childhood brought to an abrupt and tragic end by the creation of Israel in 1947, when, in fact, according to Mr. Weiner, Dr. Said's childhood home was in Cairo. it might be of value to read Said's response at the time this all came up.All this from someone who claims that I have falsified the past to pretend that I am a victim. In a 1992 interview (in Edward Said, A Critical Reader ), for instance, I spoke of Cairo as where I spent much of my childhood; this had been anticipated by my "Cairo Recalled," House and Garden, 1987. Weiner deliberately ignores all this, as he does my absolute right to say that my time in Palestine was "formative." What he cannot understand, and has not been able to understand from any of my writings, is the fact that I have been moved to defend the refugees' plight precisely because I did not suffer and therefore feel obligated to relieve the sufferings of my people, less fortunate than myself. Even Christopher Hitchens, with whom Said had had a famous parting of the ways, has this to say about the Times obit:Some of that criticism was base and outrageous and sordidly politicized�I have just finished reading the obituary in the New York Times, which in a cowardly way leaves open the question as to whether Edward, or indeed any other Palestinian, lost a home in the tragedy of 1947-48
posted by jeev |
12:36 PM |

Percentage-wise, the Texans have us beat. But not raw numbers. This headline from today's Chronicle says it all:State No. 1 in lack of health coverage More uninsured -- 6.4 million -- than any other state (For some reason, I can only get this link to load in IE. This pisses me off.)
posted by jeev |
11:43 AM |

Monday, September 29, 2003
Just don't get sick: The number of people without health insurance shot up last year by 2.4 million, the largest increase in a decade, raising the total to 43.6 million, as health costs soared and many workers lost coverage provided by employers, the Census Bureau reported today. Read the New York Times article. Don't want to register? Use "formyfriends" and "writethis".
Want to know where a lot of those uninsured folks live? The land of Dubya: One out of every four Texans lacks health insurance, the highest percentage of uninsured residents in any state in the nation, according to new Census Bureau figures.
posted by jeev |
10:13 PM |

The company that supports Ellenwear is doing a booming election business. Need a t-shirt expressing your views about the California recall? This is the place.
posted by jeev |
10:45 AM |

Sunday, September 28, 2003
The latest scandal breaking around the Bush administration is a beaut. Joseph C. Wilson IV, a former ambassador, was sent to Niger to investigate stories that Saddam Hussein was trying to buy uranium. He concluded that the stories were baseless. And when Bush used the stories as supposed evidence for invading Iraq, Wilson wrote an op-ed piece for the New York Times, disputing the administration's claims. At which point someone in the administration, seemingly trying to punish Ambassador Wilson for daring to bring up inconvenient facts, apparently leaked the occupation of Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, to the news media. She was a covert operative for the CIA. Needless to say, this is not the kind of information you want floating around about you. That's why they call it covert. As the Washington Post put it:It is a violation of law for officials to intentionally disclose the identity of a covert operative. The column by Novak [where the story of Ms. Plame's job first surfaced] came eight days after Wilson wrote a July 6 New York Times op-ed piece challenging President Bush's claim that Iraq had tried to buy "yellowcake" uranium from Niger. Also on July 6, Wilson, who had gone to Niger to investigate at the CIA's request, was quoted by The Washington Post as saying the administration was "misrepresenting the facts on an issue that was a fundamental justification for going to war." Bush has since backed off the uranium claim.
A senior administration official told The Post on Saturday that two top government officials called at least six Washington journalists and disclosed the identity and occupation of Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame. Wilson said yesterday that journalists for the three major broadcast networks told him they had been contacted by someone in the White House. He named only one, Andrea Mitchell, NBC's chief foreign affairs correspondent, who interviewed Wilson and reported on July 22 that he said the administration was "leaking his wife's covert job at the CIA to reporters." Mitchell could not be reached for comment yesterday. That'll teach you not to be a team player.
posted by jeev |
10:20 PM |

The new rhetoric, continued. An analysis by Paul Waldman in the Washington Post of why most Americans believe Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11:How did so many Americans arrive at these beliefs? For some, it was no doubt just the feeling that one evil Middle Easterner is the same as the next, and since Saddam and Osama bin Laden are both bad guys, they must be in cahoots. No one in the administration ever said, "Saddam helped plan Sept. 11," but the rhetoric before and after the war contained innumerable suggestions to that effect. It is hard to believe that the White House was unaware that if the words "Saddam Hussein" and "Sept. 11" were mentioned in the same sentence or the same paragraph, people would not make the link on their own.
This is an example of what scholars of rhetoric call enthymematic argumentation. In an enthymeme, the speaker builds an argument with one element removed, leading listeners to fill in the missing piece. On May 1, speaking from the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln, President Bush said, "The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September the 11th, 2001, and still goes on. . . . With those attacks, the terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States. And war is what they got." This is classic enthymematic argumentation: We were attacked on Sept. 11, so we went to war against Iraq. The missing piece of the argument -- "Saddam was involved in 9/11" -- didn't have to be said aloud for those listening to assimilate its message. Waldman also goes on to fault the national press for failing to push the adminstration about these tactics.
posted by jeev |
5:51 PM |

|
|