Alternate Entries
journal contact

Saturday, November 01, 2003

Michael Wood has written a lovely piece on Edward Said in October's
London Review of Books.
Edward's affection enveloped you like a roar, like a cure - even when he became the one who was ill. You felt better every time you saw him. Or rather, you felt you could be better than you were, and you thought the world was a larger place than it had seemed before.

posted by jeev | 3:16 PM |

Friday, October 31, 2003

Seasonal Erno



Yes, that's a frog hat.

posted by jeev |
10:56 PM |

Thursday, October 30, 2003

Okay. File under Blindingly Obvious: this
headline from tomorrow's New York Times

Reconstruction: Bush Got $500,000 From Companies That Got Contracts, Study Finds

They needed a study for that? But the details, you say. Well, let's see:
The overwhelming majority of government contracts for billions of dollars of reconstruction work in Iraq and Afghanistan went to companies run by executives who were heavy political contributors to both political parties.

Though the employees contributed to both parties, their giving favored Republicans by a two-to-one margin. And they gave more money to Mr. Bush than any other politician in the last 12 years.

posted by jeev | 7:59 PM |

The Memo:
But the roots of FNC's day-to-day on-air bias are actual and direct. They come in the form of an executive memo distributed electronically each morning, addressing what stories will be covered and, often, suggesting how they should be covered. To the newsroom personnel responsible for the channel's daytime programming, The Memo is the bible. If, on any given day, you notice that the Fox anchors seem to be trying to drive a particular point home, you can bet The Memo is behind it.

The Memo was born with the Bush administration, early in 2001, and, intentionally or not, has ensured that the administration's point of view consistently comes across on FNC. This year, of course, the war in Iraq became a constant subject of The Memo. But along with the obvious - information on who is where and what they'll be covering - there have been subtle hints as to the tone of the anchors' copy. For instance, from the March 20th memo: "There is something utterly incomprehensible about Kofi Annan's remarks in which he allows that his thoughts are 'with the Iraqi people.' One could ask where those thoughts were during the 23 years Saddam Hussein was brutalizing those same Iraqis. Food for thought." Can there be any doubt that the memo was offering not only "food for thought," but a direction for the FNC writers and anchors to go? Especially after describing the U.N. Secretary General's remarks as "utterly incomprehensible"?

This from
Charlie Reina, a guy who used to work there. Predictably, Fox's response is to paint Reina as a "former, disgruntled employee." No denial about the existence of the Memo, though.

posted by jeev | 3:49 PM |

Today's
Bushism:
"[A]s you know, these are open forums, you're able to come and listen to what I have to say."�Washington, D.C., Oct. 28, 2003

posted by jeev | 3:37 PM |

Security? Oh, yeah, we've got security:
Software used to count the votes in as many as 16 states has been found available on a publicly accessible Internet server. The files, which appear to reveal technical details about how votes are stored in machines made by Sequoia Voting Systems, have been accessible on the site for at least two years.

A computer programmer, who asked not to be named for fear of legal retaliation from Sequoia, says that he came upon the FTP server holding the files on Friday, when he visited the Web site of Jaguar Computer Systems, a computer consulting firm in Southern California that provides technical services to, among other customers, Riverside County. In the 2000 presidential election, Riverside became the first county in the nation to employ touch-screen machines in its precincts. Its machines are made by Sequoia.
From
Salon, so you may have to click through ads if you don't have a subscription.

posted by jeev | 10:47 AM |

Wednesday, October 29, 2003

The right name for things:
As our casualties continue to mount, America's leaders could do themselves and us a favor by calling things by their right names. What's going on in Iraq and Afghanistan today is not nation-building. It's not postwar reconstruction. It's not pacification. It's war.

It's not war just because both nations are crawling with troops. So are others. Nor is it war just because people continue to die violently. That happens every day in every city in the world. Nor is it war just because some of the victims wear uniforms. That too is not uncommon even in peacetime.

It's war because our undefeated enemies say it is and behave accordingly.
From the
Post op-ed page via Josh Marshall

posted by jeev | 11:33 AM |

Now there's a
strategy:
�Honestly, it�s a little tougher than I thought it was going to be,� [Trent] Lott said. In a sign of frustration, he offered an unorthodox military solution: �If we have to, we just mow the whole place down, see what happens. You�re dealing with insane suicide bombers who are killing our people, and we need to be very aggressive in taking them out.�

posted by jeev | 11:17 AM |

It's the little things that matter:
The entitled and the enlisted
When George W. Bush is prevaricating, he often utters a little wisecrack. At today's press briefing, when he was asked about that now-embarrassing "Mission Accomplished" banner on the USS Lincoln, he pinned that premature boast on the crew and then delivered his quip.

"I know [the banner] was attributed somehow to some ingenious advance man from my staff," said Bush. "They weren't that ingenious, by the way." Heh heh. Over at John Kerry's headquarters, the rapid response team quickly fired off a rebuke to Bush, scolding him for trying to "blame" the sailors for the sign. The Kerry press release includes this paragraph from Elizabeth Bumiller's report on White House image-making in the New York Times May 16:

"The most elaborate -- and criticized -- White House event so far was Mr. Bush's speech aboard the Abraham Lincoln announcing the end of major combat in Iraq. White House officials say that a variety of people, including the president, came up with the idea, and that [White House communications deputy Scott] Sforza embedded himself on the carrier to make preparations days before Mr. Bush's landing in a flight suit and his early evening speech. Media strategists noted afterward that Mr. Sforza and his aides had choreographed every aspect of the event, even down to the members of the Lincoln crew arrayed in coordinated shirt colors over Mr. Bush's right shoulder and the "Mission Accomplished" banner placed to perfectly capture the president and the celebratory two words in a single shot."

There's nothing surprising about this cheap little lie. The entitled always blame the enlisted. It's the American aristocratic way.
From Joe Conanson's
Journal.

posted by jeev | 9:39 AM |

No wonder I'm behind in my reading:
[Researchers Peter Lyman and Hal Varian] found twice as much new information had been created in 2002 as in 1999, the last year they studied.

This time, they even had to employ a new term of measurement: the exabyte, or a million terabytes. (A terabyte is a million megabytes.)

Last year, people generated five exabytes of information, the equivalent of a half-million new libraries the size of the Library of Congress, they reported.
Need more
information?

posted by jeev | 9:20 AM |

Tuesday, October 28, 2003

Why We Fight, con't:
According to records made available to The Washington Post and interviews with arms investigators from the United States, Britain and Australia, it did not require a comprehensive survey to find the central assertions of the Bush administration's prewar nuclear case to be insubstantial or untrue. Although Hussein did not relinquish his nuclear ambitions or technical records, investigators said, it is now clear he had no active program to build a weapon, produce its key materials or obtain the technology he needed for either.

Among the closely held internal judgments of the Iraq Survey Group, overseen by David Kay as special representative of CIA Director George J. Tenet, are that Iraq's nuclear weapons scientists did no significant arms-related work after 1991, that facilities with suspicious new construction proved benign, and that equipment of potential use to a nuclear program remained under seal or in civilian industrial use.
"Insubstantial or untrue." That's our George. Read
more in the Post. This story's a pip.

Via Josh Marshall

posted by jeev | 3:11 PM |

Wanna
buy a bag, dad?
On the initiation of Paul Bremer, the US head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, a new law, order 39, came into force last month. It permits complete foreign ownership of Iraqi companies and assets (apart from natural resources) that have hitherto been publicly owned, total overseas remittance of profits and some of the lowest corporate tax rates in the world. In short, Iraq's economy has been put up for sale.
Is it legal?
The US-led provisional authority in Iraq may be breaking international law by selling state assets, experts have warned, raising the prospect that contracts signed now by foreign investors could be scrapped by a future Iraqi government.

International businesspeople attending a conference in London this week heard that some orders issued by the US-led Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) may be in breach of the 1907 Hague Regulations and the Fourth Geneva Convention.

"Is what they are doing legitimate, is it legal?" asked Juliet Blanch, a partner at the London-based international law firm Norton Rose. "Most [experts] believe that their actions are not legal", she said. "There would be no requirement for a new government to ratify their [actions]."

International law obliges occupying powers to respect laws already in force in a country "unless absolutely prevented" from doing so.
Of course, these are British reports. Apparently this isn't of interest in the US.

posted by jeev | 2:58 PM |

What it looks like from space:



To see it even bigger, click
here.

Thanks, Mike.

posted by jeev | 10:14 AM |
Click for Oakland, California Forecast
Tasty
gorick
arts and letters daily
dogs and more
I prefer not to
Here, Now
Right here, Right now
The Blank Page
DiRT, ian's doc reviewing tool

Del.icio.us
Miss something?
Where all this comes from

xml(Atom feed for the blog, which is not the Del.icio.us feed)
It's always Friday here
www.flickr.com
Archive
site tools
blogger.com
Hosted by Laughing Squid
haloscan.com
Subscribe with Bloglines
Get Firefox!
Google

Web jeev.org

The Darfur Wall Project