Alternate Entries
journal contact

Sunday, August 29, 2004

Supporting gay marriage is equal to supporting Hitler? Sheri Dew, chosen to present the opening invocation at the Republican National Convention, seems to think this is a fair comparison. In a recent speech she opined:
Also, while I was peddling away, I found myself reading the latest edition of one of the nation's most popular news magazines. One of the major articles was about gay "marriage." There were several statements that stood out for me in a dramatic and terrifying way, but one of the most sobering features of the entire article was a picture of two handsome, young men, getting "married." What distressed me most was the fact that they were both holding an infant "daughter"--twin girls they had adopted. I was, frankly, heartsick. What kind of chance do those girls have being raised in that kind of setting? What will their understanding of men and women, marriage and families be? Is there any chance that, as adults, they could expect to marry and enjoy a healthy relationship with a man, including rearing children together? In addition, there were alarming concepts about "family" presented throughout the article-concepts that even questioned the validity of heterosexual families.

To say I found the entire article sobering would be a grand understatement. And I found myself thinking, "Talk about influence. Imagine the influence of that one magazine in presenting ideas about the family that are totally in opposition to God's plan and will for His children."

Lining Up With Hitler or Against Him

This escalating situation reminds me of a statement of a World War II journalist by the name of Dorothy Thompson who wrote for the Saturday Evening Post in Europe during the pre-World War II years when Hitler was building up his armies and star"ing to take ground. In an address she delivered in Toronto in 1941 she said this: "Before this epic is over, every living human being will have chosen. Every living human being will have lined up with Hitler or against him. Every living human being either will have opposed this onslaught or supported it, for if he tries to make no choice that in itself will be a choice. If he takes no side, he is on Hitler's side. If he does not act, that is an act--for Hitler."

May I take the liberty of reading this statement again and changing just a few words, applying it to what I fear we face today? "Before this era is over, every living human being will have chosen. Every living human being will have lined up in support of the family or against it. Every living human being will have either opposed the onslaught against the family or supported it, for if he tries to make no choice that in itself will be a choice. If we do not act in behalf of the family, that is itself an act of opposition to the family."

At first it may seem a bit extreme to imply a comparison between the atrocities of Hitler and what is happening in terms of contemporary threats against the family--but maybe not.
Two people in a committed, loving relationship equal to the the author of the Holocaust? A bit extreme? For the Republicans, apparently not.

Via
Atrios.

posted by jeev | 7:08 PM |
Click for Oakland, California Forecast
Tasty
gorick
arts and letters daily
dogs and more
I prefer not to
Here, Now
Right here, Right now
The Blank Page
DiRT, ian's doc reviewing tool

Del.icio.us
Miss something?
Where all this comes from

xml(Atom feed for the blog, which is not the Del.icio.us feed)
It's always Friday here
www.flickr.com
Archive
site tools
blogger.com
Hosted by Laughing Squid
haloscan.com
Subscribe with Bloglines
Get Firefox!
Google

Web jeev.org

The Darfur Wall Project